| Title | Veritas filia temporis en Averroes. Comentario a Metafísica II, 1 |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2005 |
| Journal | Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía |
| Volume | 29 |
| Pages | 13–28 |
| Categories | Commentary, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Rafael Ramón Guerrero |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Averroes, stoutly influenced by Aristotle, affirmed the necessity of experience to increase all knowledge. Truth, thing's last nature, is obtained as time elapses and is only reached by accepting the predecessors's participation. Progress implies tradition and betterment: the former by impelling the development of both culture and intellect, and the latter as a result of a critical screening of diverse opinions, since it facilitates the knowledge of truth and the recognition of error. This scientific progress is reached as a consequence of effort and collaboration. Averroes sustained these ideas in his Commentary to Metaphysics II, 1, distinguishing four parts: a) Man's natural desire of truth and intellect's difficulty for reaching the most intelligible things; b) The predecessors's contribution, by their commentaries and clarifications, and the historical-progressive character of human reason; c) Philosophy, science of truth, as an investigation of complete reality; d) Truth as knowledge of cause, that is to say, the consideration of things as prove of their Author. Averroes also stated that both the Law, through Revelation, and philosophy, through reason, have the same objective, therefore it being compulsory to recur to previous contributions. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1560","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1560,"authors_free":[{"id":1791,"entry_id":1560,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":844,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Rafael Ram\u00f3n Guerrero","free_first_name":"Rafael Ram\u00f3n","free_last_name":"Guerrero","norm_person":{"id":844,"first_name":"Rafael","last_name":"Ram\u00f3n Guerrero","full_name":"Rafael Ram\u00f3n Guerrero","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/105670229X","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/73930694","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Rafael Ram\u00f3n Guerrero"}}],"entry_title":"Veritas filia temporis en Averroes. Comentario a Metaf\u00edsica II, 1","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Veritas filia temporis en Averroes. Comentario a Metaf\u00edsica II, 1"},"abstract":"Averroes, stoutly influenced by Aristotle, affirmed the necessity of experience to increase all knowledge. Truth, thing's last nature, is obtained as time elapses and is only reached by accepting the predecessors's participation. Progress implies tradition and betterment: the former by impelling the development of both culture and intellect, and the latter as a result of a critical screening of diverse opinions, since it facilitates the knowledge of truth and the recognition of error. This scientific progress is reached as a consequence of effort and collaboration. Averroes sustained these ideas in his Commentary to Metaphysics II, 1, distinguishing four parts: a) Man's natural desire of truth and intellect's difficulty for reaching the most intelligible things; b) The predecessors's contribution, by their commentaries and clarifications, and the historical-progressive character of human reason; c) Philosophy, science of truth, as an investigation of complete reality; d) Truth as knowledge of cause, that is to say, the consideration of things as prove of their Author. Averroes also stated that both the Law, through Revelation, and philosophy, through reason, have the same objective, therefore it being compulsory to recur to previous contributions.","btype":3,"date":"2005","language":"Spanish","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":844,"full_name":"Rafael Ram\u00f3n Guerrero","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1560,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"T\u00f3picos. Revista de Filosof\u00eda","volume":"29","issue":null,"pages":"13\u201328"}},"sort":[2005]}
| Title | Veritas filia temporis en Averroes. Comentario a Metafísica II, 1 |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2005 |
| Journal | Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía |
| Volume | 29 |
| Pages | 13–28 |
| Categories | Commentary, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Rafael Ramón Guerrero |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Averroes, stoutly influenced by Aristotle, affirmed the necessity of experience to increase all knowledge. Truth, thing's last nature, is obtained as time elapses and is only reached by accepting the predecessors's participation. Progress implies tradition and betterment: the former by impelling the development of both culture and intellect, and the latter as a result of a critical screening of diverse opinions, since it facilitates the knowledge of truth and the recognition of error. This scientific progress is reached as a consequence of effort and collaboration. Averroes sustained these ideas in his Commentary to Metaphysics II, 1, distinguishing four parts: a) Man's natural desire of truth and intellect's difficulty for reaching the most intelligible things; b) The predecessors's contribution, by their commentaries and clarifications, and the historical-progressive character of human reason; c) Philosophy, science of truth, as an investigation of complete reality; d) Truth as knowledge of cause, that is to say, the consideration of things as prove of their Author. Averroes also stated that both the Law, through Revelation, and philosophy, through reason, have the same objective, therefore it being compulsory to recur to previous contributions. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1560","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1560,"authors_free":[{"id":1791,"entry_id":1560,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":844,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Rafael Ram\u00f3n Guerrero","free_first_name":"Rafael Ram\u00f3n","free_last_name":"Guerrero","norm_person":{"id":844,"first_name":"Rafael","last_name":"Ram\u00f3n Guerrero","full_name":"Rafael Ram\u00f3n Guerrero","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/105670229X","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/73930694","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Rafael Ram\u00f3n Guerrero"}}],"entry_title":"Veritas filia temporis en Averroes. Comentario a Metaf\u00edsica II, 1","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Veritas filia temporis en Averroes. Comentario a Metaf\u00edsica II, 1"},"abstract":"Averroes, stoutly influenced by Aristotle, affirmed the necessity of experience to increase all knowledge. Truth, thing's last nature, is obtained as time elapses and is only reached by accepting the predecessors's participation. Progress implies tradition and betterment: the former by impelling the development of both culture and intellect, and the latter as a result of a critical screening of diverse opinions, since it facilitates the knowledge of truth and the recognition of error. This scientific progress is reached as a consequence of effort and collaboration. Averroes sustained these ideas in his Commentary to Metaphysics II, 1, distinguishing four parts: a) Man's natural desire of truth and intellect's difficulty for reaching the most intelligible things; b) The predecessors's contribution, by their commentaries and clarifications, and the historical-progressive character of human reason; c) Philosophy, science of truth, as an investigation of complete reality; d) Truth as knowledge of cause, that is to say, the consideration of things as prove of their Author. Averroes also stated that both the Law, through Revelation, and philosophy, through reason, have the same objective, therefore it being compulsory to recur to previous contributions.","btype":3,"date":"2005","language":"Spanish","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":844,"full_name":"Rafael Ram\u00f3n Guerrero","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1560,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"T\u00f3picos. Revista de Filosof\u00eda","volume":"29","issue":null,"pages":"13\u201328"}},"sort":["Veritas filia temporis en Averroes. Comentario a Metaf\u00edsica II, 1"]}